Wednesday, November 25, 2015

LINKS: Ohio State vs Michigan, 2015

The Game





Ohio State
Offense

Tunnel Screen and Slip Block - Big part of OSU's lateral attack (along with 2-back offense). Puts stress on DBs to communicate during the play.


OSU's Tight Split Zone - Base run play of which much of their offense is based around


60Y Curl - Tight Split Zone is primary run play; 60Y Curl is a primary way they isolate receivers on DBs

Wham Play - A change-up from their tight split zone. How UM had a good chunk of run success against MSU.


OSU 2-Back Offense - They like to motion in the H to get speed to the edge. Zeke is a great lead blocker for QB sweeps as well which killed MSU in the redzone last year.


OSU Pin and Pull - Another way for OSU to get to the edge if MSU commits DEs inside. Like to run counter action with Barrett off of this look

OSU Speed Option Package - Another way for the Buckeyes to get to the edge, typically a check based on defensive numbers.

OSU Pivot Follow Concept - How OSU works to get open underneath routes on what initially looks like the mesh concept

Sail and Cob Concepts Combined - A favorite way for OSU to attack down field with the pass. Puts a lot of stress on DBs to cover for a long time and communicate across the field.


7-Ins Concept - How OSU likes to attack with their slot, particularly in the red zone

Defense
OSU also plays a Cover 4 base and has a similar blitz package, but OSU will play more MOD (though MEG is still their primary) and play their safeties deeper than MSU.

Cover 4 Coverage - MSU has been mixing up their coverage away from MEG more this season; still primarily MEG


Cover 4 Front 7 Leverage - How MSU Adjusts Front 7 to give easy keys and play fast

Cover 4 Safety Play - The rules of playing Cover 4 Safety


OSU Cover 4 Solo Adjustment - How Ohio State plays trips sets


OSU D-Line Drills - One of the best DLs in the B1G.

And as always, more links with the OSU Tab

LINK

Michigan
Offense
Jim Harbaugh Primer - Going over the basics of a Jim Harbaugh coached team

Michigan Rushing Attack - Going over in detail a number of the Michigan run schemes



Threatening Width with Tight Formations - How Michigan spreads the field despite heavy sets



Weakside Flood - A look at the triangle reads often given to Rudock on one side of the field

Defense

Cover 1 Fundamentals - Michigan's Base D, though they also run Cover 3 and Man Under



Cover 1 Adjustments - How Michigan adjusts within Cover 1 to certain looks

Attacking Michigan's Defense in the Hole - Also expect a lot of jet action from OSU's 2-back offense



And there's always more at the Michigan tag

Both
Many iterations of Power O - A look at how Power O is used out of a variety of looks

Wham! and Return of the Trap - How both teams use trap and wham blocks to their advantage

Utilizing Pulling OL and FBs to create extra gaps - More UM than MSU, but both do this quite a bit

Tunnel Screen Fundamentals - How Michigan utilizes the smoke screen in their offense and OSU the tunnel screen

Press Coverage Technique - Applies to both teams, but is from an Ash (OSU) presentation.

Friday, November 20, 2015

Inside the Playbook: MSU Play Action Blocking and the Wheel

Michigan State dug deep into their jet sweep package against Michigan, and the result was a wide-open FB near the sideline that would eventually go over 70 yards for a near TD. I want to look a bit closer at this play and why it is so successful.

MSU Jet Sweep Wheel
MSU has a fairly deep jet sweep and jet sweep action package that they deploy weekly as a means to attack the edge with skilled receivers. Recently, they pulled out the FB wheel. If it looked familiar, I diagramed it in October 2014 as a play MSU should add to their jet sweep package. It looks kind of like this, with an important addition that is the purpose of this article.



A Very Wise Coach Once Told Me: “If you really want play action, you better pull a guard”
This is a quote I stole from Smart Football when he reiterated former Jim Harbaugh assistant Greg Roman’s phrase. But in today’s college football, it isn’t the current Michigan coach that is king in this regard, as there isn’t a better team at selling the run by pulling OL than the Spartans of Michigan State.

Let’s clip like a few plays from this season, shall we...

Examples
Watch the RG outside


Watch the RG pull inside like Power O


RG pull across formation like sweep


LG and RG on sweep action (results in INT as D does good job)


Whole OL blocks stretch (RB aborts as defense comes on blitz)


They'll pull anyone, OGs, OTs, even the center. You get the picture, they sell run action hard in the play action scheme, and that starts with your protection schemes.

Why Pulling OL is Effective
All defenses and defenders have keys or reads that they are accustomed to reacting to, and in many cases, are required to react to in order to maintain a gap sound defense. When an OL pulls, it adds shifts gaps along the LOS, and LBs need to react to that pull in order to maintain gap discipline, just as if it were a run. Safeties often times have to do this as well in many defenses. This means that the defense must respect the run, and means they can't get into their pass drops as quickly. So that's how it moves and forces the defensive back 7 to react, and take their mind off their coverage.

It also can help your protection against the defensive line. In the case of roll outs, it gets a blocker on the edge to help protect the QB and help move the QB. I talked previously how MSU defends Power O and how their DL has triangles. That doesn't go away on a pass play, and it certainly doesn't go away on run action. The DL must maintain their run discipline when they see an OL pulling into their triangle. This prevents them from getting into their pass rush moves and lanes.

So you improve your ability to move the pocket, which slows the rush in it's own right and alters the aiming point of the rush; but you also slow the rush because they must defend against the run. On the back end, you force LBs and safeties to react to the run threat, often times forcing them to step toward the LOS or laterally, rather than gaining depth in their coverage or sticking with their man. That's the power of pulling OL in your play action pass scheme.

Why Doesn't Everyone Do This
Put simply: it's difficult. When you sell run, the OL can't immediately get into their pass drop because they need to leave enough room for the puller to get across the formation. This puts them at a disadvantageous angle at the snap before they can begin gaining depth. For the puller, he doesn't immediately have his eyes on his target pre-snap, instead, he has to move to a different location, find his target, beat him to a spot, get set, and then start his protection; and he also has to be a good puller.

So the reality is that it's a lot of moving parts, a lot of communication is required, great technique is required to get to your spot as a blocker to prevent defensive penetration. If you try to do this and you don't do it well it looks awful and it's very ineffective. Many teams simply don't have the technique and don't want to spend the time required to install such a deep pass protection scheme into their system. But if pulling OL are a big part of your run game, it really does make your play action pass attack that much more potent.

Jet Action Wheel
So back to that Jet Action wheel route I discussed previously, and how MSU one-ups it.

MSU this year has run a lot of counter action with their jet motion. But first they show an OL pulling to lead block to seal the edge for the jet sweep. Many teams react to the jet motion by rotating their defensive backs and having a safety fill the alley.

MSU will counter this action by attacking the opposite edge with the counter run. This looks something like this.


However, the Spartans do a few things here. First, the RB Power to the left, which pulls the RG, holds the right side of Michigan's defense. Then they slip the center in front of the pulling OG to lead the jet motion receiver to the edge. The LG and LT down block inside, the RT and TE down block on the right side, squeezing much of the gap that the defense could split the OL with (not that the DL is trying to work vertically with all the horizontal movement).

So the defense is busy reacting side-to-side with all the horizontal run threats and OL pulling. This pulls up LBs and safeties to account for the gaps. The FB that slips out simply looks like another lead blocker, one that the defense must respect as a lead blocker because he can insert himself on the edge and add a gap. So when the FB slips vertically behind where the power route just vacated, the defense is busy reading and reacting to all the horizontal run threats, forgets about the back slipping out, and it's wide open for a huge gain for the offense.



Note: the pulling RG takes the WILL, who has to account for the gap added outside. The MIKE follows the RB, who needs a defender to follow so that there is a defender to tackle him if he gets the ball. The pulling OC is accounted for by the SAM. The gap added by inserting the FB is handled by the SS. This leaves the FS to crash down to account for the jet sweep player. That leaves no body accounting for the FB as an actual receiver.

Video

Monday, November 16, 2015

LINKS: Michigan State vs Ohio State, 2015

A roundup of the BDS links for the Spartans/Buckeyes game. I'll have at least one more MSU post this week as well.




Michigan State
Offense
How MSU Defends Power O - MSU's 4-3 Over against UM's Base Run


MSU Jet Sweep Package - A big part of the MSU offense



MSU Trap Play - OSU likes to Wham (see below), but MSU had a lot of success on the ground last year running trap plays. Watch for it again this year.

MSU Mesh Play - A base scheme to expect against Michigan's Cover 1

MSU Switch Vertical Concept - MSU's Primary Deep Route Concept; go to it often (almost two dozen times against UM)


Pulling OL is Pass Pro - How MSU's forces the defense to key run on their passes.

Defense
Cover 4 Coverage - MSU has been mixing up their coverage away from MEG more this season; still primarily MEG


Cover 4 Front 7 Leverage - How MSU Adjusts Front 7 to give easy keys and play fast


Cover 4 Safety Play - The rules of playing Cover 4 Safety

Three links on MSU's Blitz Package:
LINK 1
LINK 2
LINK 3

And there is always more at the MSU tag

Ohio State
Offense

Tunnel Screen and Slip Block - Big part of OSU's lateral attack (along with 2-back offense). Puts stress on DBs to communicate during the play.


OSU's Tight Split Zone - Base run play of which much of their offense is based around


60Y Curl - Tight Split Zone is primary run play; 60Y Curl is a primary way they isolate receivers on DBs

Wham Play - A change-up from their tight split zone. How UM had a good chunk of run success against MSU.


OSU 2-Back Offense - They like to motion in the H to get speed to the edge. Zeke is a great lead blocker for QB sweeps as well which killed MSU in the redzone last year.


OSU Pin and Pull - Another way for OSU to get to the edge if MSU commits DEs inside. Like to run counter action with Barrett off of this look

OSU Speed Option Package - Another way for the Buckeyes to get to the edge, typically a check based on defensive numbers.

Sail and Cob Concepts Combined - A favorite way for OSU to attack down field with the pass. Puts a lot of stress on DBs to cover for a long time and communicate across the field.


7-Ins Concept - How OSU likes to attack with their slot, particularly in the red zone

Follow Pivot Concept - How OSU initially gives a mesh look and is still able to get open receivers underneath.

Defense
OSU also plays a Cover 4 base and has a similar blitz package, but OSU will play more MOD (though MEG is still their primary) and play their safeties deeper than MSU.

Cover 4 Coverage - MSU has been mixing up their coverage away from MEG more this season; still primarily MEG


Cover 4 Front 7 Leverage - How MSU Adjusts Front 7 to give easy keys and play fast

Cover 4 Safety Play - The rules of playing Cover 4 Safety


OSU Cover 4 Solo Adjustment - How Ohio State plays trips sets


OSU D-Line Drills - One of the best DLs in the B1G.

Press Coverage Technique - Applies to both teams, but is from an Ash presentation.

And as always, more links with the OSU Tab
LINK

Inside the Playbook: Illinois RPO vs Ohio State "Solo" Adjustment

Illinois didn’t have a lot of success against the Ohio State defense, but they did have a really nice run-pass option (RPO, aka package play) that they went to in order to take advantage of the Buckeye’s base Cover 4 defense.



The Setup
The Illini spent much of the day in trips split sets, which has its positives and negatives for the offense. This offense actually alleviates some of the quick hitting run pass options that plague many of the Cover 4 teams by not putting the safeties in as rapid of a run/pass option from the slot. But the Buckeyes play their safeties deeper than many Cover 4 defenses (such as Michigan State) which is their way of adapting to the spread, as it mitigates some of that run/pass conflict that the slot can attack by giving the safety more time read the play before reacting.

But a trips set doesn’t take the pressure off the defense. It still puts several players in difficult run pass conflicts, and it dictates the defense in such a way that it pulls defenders outside of the box to help in coverage support. Let’s take a look at how OSU typically plays trips sets.

Cover 4 Trips Adjustment
The Buckeyes typically adjust to trips with what is known as a “Solo” adjustment. The “solo” designation is because the isolated CB will no longer have over the top safety help, and instead will be matched up on an island with the lone split receiver. The safety initially lined up over the top of him instead will be responsible for covering the #3 WR on the opposite side of the field if he attacks vertically.



Run-Pass Option
One of the primary ways of defeating this coverage is to attack the defender that is left on an island. However, this is typically into the boundary and has underneath help from the LBs, so it must clear deep enough (meaning the offense must protect long enough) to allow the receiver to get down field; Illinois didn’t attack that proposition much. Instead, they went with a run-pass option.

The first read for the QB is a standard zone read of the DE. Lining up the RB toward the trips set allows both the first and second read to be in the same lane for the QB. If the DE stays home on the backside of the play, the QB gives to the RB on an inside zone run. If the DE crashes on the RB, he pulls the ball and takes his eyes to his second read: the flat defender (typically the OLB to that side against a Cover 4 scheme).

The flat defender is then forced to follow the bubble action from the #2 receiver or stay home to protect against the hitch. The hitch is being run about 7-9 yards, deep enough to get behind the LBs but in the gap between the 2nd and 3rd levels, but shallow/quick enough to not allow the safety from the opposite side of the field to play both the run and pass. He will settle down in the void in coverage.

If the flat defender bails outside (his shoulders are pointed to the sideline) the QB will look to the hitch. If his shoulders remain square or are turned inside, then he typically isn’t in a position to run down the bubble screen, and so the QB throws the bubble.

The outside receiver will essentially run a post, but he’s actually pulling the CB out of coverage and looking to block the safety, taking care of two defenders at once. This holds the safety aligned to the trips set and forces him to play deep (not allowing him to cheat up).


Examples
Here's the set up, 2nd and 10.


What you'll see after the snap is that Illinois is actually reading the MIKE, the ILB lined up over in the yellow box. He charges, so the QB pulls. Next he is reading the OLB, who you see turn and run with the bubble. You'll also note that the FS is retreating in coverage into a deep center while the SS stays in sort of a deep half coverage.


On the catch, it's actually the SS - who would help out the CB over the #1 in a longer progressing play - come down and make the tackle.


Here we are two plays later, after Illinois picks up a first down. Same formation, but flipped.


Immediately after the snap, see the MIKE charging at the run, and see how the OLB (Lee, has his shoulders turned inside. He's going to throw the bubble.


The ball carrier gets outside Lee and this turns into a 20+ yard gain.

The very next play, OSU comes out like this.


The QB makes a mistake and relies on his pre-snap read, which tells him the MIKE is in an apex, so he's out of the play. So he hands off. You'll note that the safety to the trips set has come down more to take away the quick throw, but the slant (which this route converts to) is still open over the middle of the field. This is a poor and impatient read by Lunt.


The Buckeyes clean up and get a TFL against the run with the extra LB. That adjustment with the MIKE is what we'll discuss next though.

OSU Adjusting Formation to Cover
There are several things that OSU can and does do. For one, their blitz package is typically a 3 under, 3 over or 2 under, 3 over coverage; or in summary, it’s a three-high defense, which differs from their standard Cover 4 and has a different rotation (thus changing where the QB must take his eyes). So teams can’t just be predictable with it.

Of course, there are also things in the Cover 4 scheme that they can do, such as running a trap coverage (allowing the CB to take any receiver that runs immediately to the flat, such as a bubble) that can mess with the QB’s reads.

As far as OSU is concerned, for the most part, they simply have superior players. Lee, the OLB typically tasked with playing that underneath zone, is a sort of safety/LB hybrid, in that he moves like a safety but hits like a LB. He is great at getting into his lane outside of the #2, so it is very difficult to get outside on him, even when he doesn’t immediately commit to the bubble. The rest of the defense, particularly the DBs, are athletic and mostly sound. That allows them to leave the boundary CB on an island.

But sometimes, even superior DBs aren’t enough to handle the coverage. In this game, after a few drives, OSU made an adjustment to their formation. They trusted a 5 man box to win against the 5 OL and split the MIKE into an apex position between the offensive EMOL and #3. With his read/run fit, he comes directly from the spot where the hitch tries to sit, meaning he’s sitting directly underneath where the offense wants to go. This forces the receiver to carry his route farther, allowing the far safety to react and get the coverage.



Did Illinois Adjust to This?
In fact, they did. When you split the MIKE out wide, you trust your front 5 to be able to win battles. But you also put pressure on your safeties to come up in run support on the interior. The safety to the trips set is still primarily a coverage defender, but the safety away from the trips set has more run pressure applied to him. That allows the offense to run something like this:


 All this happened in the span of two drives midway through the third quarter, and it was very interesting to watch.

Conclusion

Illinois wasn’t really able to move the ball consistently on the Buckeyes, but a lot of that was the complete inability to move the ball on the ground. Through the air, they were able to have a little bit of success. Despite the outcome of the game, the chess match gives some good film for future opponents that are closer in skill to Ohio State. But at the end of the day, OSU is still very strong along their defense, and this just goes to show that even when the scheme is in your favor, good players and good execution can overcome some schematic weakness.

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Inside the Playbook: Minnesota's Use of TEs to Attack the Hole

I’ve talked previously about the advantage of having good H-backs in an offensive system. Minnesota, coming off the Maxx Williams era, has continued to use TEs/H-Backs/FBs in a variety of ways to present match up issues through the use of formations/keys. Against Michigan – a team that primarily plays Cover 1 with a very deep center-field safety – they used the position of the H-Back to attack what is known as the “hole” of the defense. The hole – typically associated with Cover 2 teams – is the void in the defense in front of the safety level (typically directly between the two-high safeties) and behind the LB level. Let’s take a look at how Minnesota attacked this void through the air, and how it was set up with their formations.





Heavy Personnel – Split TEs
Minnesota comes out in 22 personnel (2-TEs and 2-RBs) and only 1 WR. This forces Michigan to stay in at least their base defensive personnel group of a 4-3, but they went one better and came out in a 4-4, further limiting their options. When the Gophers break the huddle, they split two heavy guys to the field, another to the boundary, and the WR (Maye) in the slot to the boundary. Minnesota then motions the WR from the boundary to the #3 position to the field.

Defensive Reaction
Forcing the defense to come out in a 4-3 limits how the defense can play this. The defense really has five options here:    
  1. Rotate the field CB inside.
  2. Move a safety down
  3. Lock with the motion and have boundary CB follow WR across formation
  4. Walk out a LB
  5. Go zone

Some of these options overlap; all of them have weaknesses.

Let’s start with the first option: rotating the field CB inside to match up with the WR. CBs like to play on the outside; it is where they are accustomed to taking on a run play, it’s where they are comfortable with where to take their eyes, it’s where they can limit the direction receivers can attack you. It’s also the position the receiver has the most space to work, in that the defender has a lot of field to cover. Moving a CB inside forces another defender to cover that space, either a safety or a LB. Moving the WR into the #3 position with late motion would mean that the CB would have to communicate a very late switch with either a safety or a LB to get on the outside guy while he moved inside; the risks the defense not being set up and having a communication breakdown.



This now overlaps with the second item above. Most likely, a safety is already rotated down to cover the #2; if not, he’s helping out over the top. But by rotating a safety down, you are tipping your coverage. Either the defender on the outside (either a LB who isn’t used to working in space or an out-sized CB) has no help over the top. The only other option is to move the boundary safety across the field to help over the top or move him across the field to cover the WR. Neither of these things are optimal. Moving the safety pre-snap leaves a one-on-one situation with an out-sized player to the boundary; it also still has a safety matched up with a WR in the slot (tough cover) and leaves no one deep or has safety help over the top but still leaves you with matchup problems still (to the boundary, #1 to the field with no help over the top; LB in space either over #2 or covering a WR).


Here’s what it looks like rotating the field safety down.



And here’s the issue rotating the boundary safety down.



The third option is something Michigan ended up countering with, and is another advantage to adding the motion man. Motioning across the formation tips the coverage. Now you have a CB locked onto a WR moving through wash to get to the far side of the field. This sets up a lot of rub routes and is a very difficult cover for the CB. Similarly, it still leaves another player to defender the boundary player that isn’t accustomed to covering in space. Either a LB (though he may have safety help over the top, but that likely limits safety help over the trips side or forces the defense to play with 5 defenders in the box) or moving a safety onto an island to the boundary.



The fourth option has been discussed in a few of these. You can cover #2 and #3 with LBs, but this takes two defenders out of the box (leaving you with five against five blockers and two potential ball carriers) and still often sees a LB matched up against a WR. Yes, the coverage has help, but run support does not; and it’s typically the MIKE (often the worst cover LB) that is forced to cover the #3.



As far as going zone, that works, but your hand is tipped (often by the motion of the WR). You lose the tight coverage you desire, and you’re still forced to have LBs try to cover quicker counterparts underneath.

How It Works for Minnesota
So what you see is that, simply by formation, Minnesota has forced Michigan into a tough situation for how they want to play it. Michigan ends up leaving both CBs on the outside threats, moving a LB out over #2 (leaving the field safety to help over the top), and moving the MIKE into sort of an apex position between #3 and the offensive EMOL. The MIKE is put into a run/pass conflict, and the coverage is tipped. Minnesota attacks the hole.

The Minnesota WR runs what I’m calling a Quick 6 (aka. Bolt Route, Slice Route; it may be a choice route but I doubt it) it which his stems quickly inside, gets vertical behind the LB (often the stem to set up a corner route or an out route) and then slants across the field directly into the hole of the defense, behind the LBs (setting himself up in the throwing lane between the underneath defenders) and in front of the safety. Easy-peasy lemon-squeezy.




H-Back in a Blocking-Back Position
Blocking-Back (BB) designation comes from old single-wing to separate the positioning of the player from that of a wing-back (typically off the LOS outside a TE or OT) or an Halfback (typically half way back – hence the name – and offset). The Blocking-Back lines up directly behind the OL, lined up between an OT and OG. As the term indicates, they are most often used for blocking, as they allow the offense to insert a blocker through the LOS or outside the LOS with the additional benefit of often times hiding him behind the big uglies up front (as to not give away the play direction). Rarely are they used in the pass game except to leak out of the backfield, as their position makes it difficult to get a clean vertical release.



How It Works for Minnesota
Minnesota likes to run Lead Inside Zone to the weak side of the formation. The BB position puts that FB/HB in a spot to get through the LOS quickly and attack the playside LB before he can get down  into the hole the RB is trying to attack; so it’s a good spot to run the ball out of.



For that reason, it’s also a good spot to run play action out of. By positioning him in the BB position, it forces the LB into a really difficult run/pass conflict. While the OL doesn’t hard sell the run fake, the OT still kicks the DE and the is still OG moves inside on the interior defender, and combined with the FB coming full speed at the LB, it sells it enough to force the LB to react down to defend the run immediately.

This reaction to the run allows the BB to slip the block and run what is often referred to as a “bender” route (though typically run from the slot, this has the same purpose) in which the receiver starts by slightly stemming outside before bending his route back inward and attacking the void in the defense. He can do so by either carrying out the seam or post, flattening his route into more of a dig, or running into the hole of the defense and settling. The ball comes out before the receiver can even settle though, and it’s a big gain as the offense, with their positioning and tendency, has forced the LB into a very difficult conflict.




Conclusion
I love moving players around because it forces the defense to think constantly. On top of that, it gives the offense ways to exploit how defenses typically set up and react. Both of these plays are examples of Minnesota doing just that with their TE group. It’s something you see more and more around football today, and is a key way in which Minnesota remains a “heavy team” but still stressed the defense in the pass game.